Springwatch gives succour to our souls, but should it do more?

The BBC nature programme is good at engaging with the public but it fails to address the threat of human development

Springwatch is back, the BBC’s largest outside broadcasting event with regular audiences approaching 4 million. I’m among its greatest fans, having watched every series – and spin-offs, Autumnwatch and Winterwatch – since it began in 2005. But this year I’ve begun to worry about the gulf opening up between the wonderful richness on the screens and the urgent biodiversity crisis unfolding off camera.

Springwatch’s unique contribution to wildlife programming is its emphasis on citizen science. The audience is encouraged to observe and submit data about their gardens and local spaces, a model of environmental engagement. But deep down, Springwatch is rooted in the Attenborough tradition of nature programming: intimate stories of wildlife, focusing on nature’s eternal beauty and fascinating behaviours. What’s missing is coverage of the human pressures on their habitat. 

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/26/springwatch-succour-souls-bbc-nature-threat-human-development

Back to nature

Wildlife programming returns to ITV, but is Deep Jungle a fresh take on the genre or a triumph of format over fact?

For a long time, it seemed that wildlife programming was extinct on ITV, but tomorrow the network launches its first primetime natural history documentary since the glory days of Survival.

As the opening sequence of Deep Jungle tracks over a computer-generated jungle and explorers flash lasers through the canopies, wildlife’s return to the mainstream will inevitably provoke questions. Is this evidence of a wildlife renaissance or the triumph of a new entertainment-driven species: all format and no fact?

Full article: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2005/may/09/broadcasting.ITV

Perverts and narcissists

Channel 4′s cashing in on a Chinese artist eating a dead baby is a greater outrage than the cannibalism itself

Channel 4, which last month brought us the first “performance” autopsy, is now offering us the chance to see pictures of a Chinese performance artist eating a dead baby’s flesh. Last year they also attempted to make us laugh at the sexual abuse of children. Around each there have been complex intellectual debates, especially amongst the liberal intelligentsia, but somehow the simple question always gets overlooked: whatever happened to limits and taboos?

Full article: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/jan/01/channel4.comment

Ulrika has the last word

Those who thought the main interest of Ulrika Jonsson’s autobiography would be Sven-Goran Eriksson’s tangled love life were in for a surprise. Sven isn’t the only famous man whose career is being shaken by her revelations. Indeed he must be sighing with relief now attention has shifted to her accusation of rape against a television personality. Everyone in the media knows this man’s identity. His career “is now over”, one senior executive is quoted as saying, “whether his name is out or not”.

Full article: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2002/oct/23/broadcasting.pressandpublishing

Seeing is reliving

Tragedies hurt us all, even if we are just watching on television

Are we all suffering from a version of post-traumatic stress caused by repeated exposure to horrific images in the media? This may sound insulting to those involved in disasters. But modern media with their graphic coverage of horrific events may be stirring up public anxiety and grief which has no recognition or outlet. Could this be one reason for increased levels of anxiety, depression and stress-related illnesses?

Full article: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/mar/04/selby.railtravel